syrupUSDC — Risk Report
Moderate-to-low risk · 6.5/10
syrupUSDC is a USDC-denominated vault share in Maple’s institutional lending and supporting-strategy portfolio.
Live backing and exit dashboard
Summary
Depositing USDC buys a share whose net asset value (NAV) accrues yield. syrupUSDC is not a dollar-pegged stablecoin: credit losses, supporting-strategy losses or an underlying-token depeg can reduce its value. It shares governance, custody dependencies and some borrowers with its sibling, while the pools have different delegate addresses.
Financial data and retained quote history were reviewed on October 13, 2026. Authority measurements remain September 6 and contract assurance October 3; no new live role enumeration or timed redemption supports this review. The verified-through date reflects the oldest retained authority evidence.
Producer snapshot 2026-10-13T09:43:47Z; collateral records dated 2026-10-13T09:43:25Z. Financial figures are from the dated producer snapshot; live magnitudes can differ.
| Metric | October 13 snapshot | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Pool assets | $1,058.91M | Canonical totalAssets; not the sum of chain supplies |
| NAV | 1.187809 | Underlying token per share |
| Enumerated principal | $1,033.71M | All active positions, including pool-owned liquidity |
| Loan / liquidity records | 27 / 8 | Loan / pool-owned strategy classification |
| Loan-classified principal | $950.71M | Includes at-par loans; category is not collateral quality |
| Numeric collateral coverage | 85.15% / 85.96% | All-principal / loan-classified-principal denominators |
| Free liquidity | 2.38% | Cash plus accrued strategy interest; not all instantly spendable cash |
| Pool cash | $22,971,856.82 | Underlying held in canonical pool |
| Current discount to NAV | -10.35 bps | Market price vs contemporaneous NAV |
| Core APY | 5.27% | Maple GraphQL; separate 7-day NAV estimate 5.15% |
| Impaired / called / defaulted | 0 / 0 / 0 | Current producer flags; recognized losses $0 |
1 · Stability — 8.5
Yield accrues into the share price rather than being distributed through a rebase. Core APY was 5.27% at the October 13 snapshot, principally from lending and supporting strategies; rates vary with the portfolio. Market discounts to NAV are distinct from a stablecoin depeg.
Risks and limitations. The snapshot reports zero impaired, called or defaulted positions and no recognized losses. These are current accounting observations, not independent proof of lifetime loss-free performance or adequate collateral on every loan. A default can write down NAV, and yield can fall or turn negative.
2 · Backing — 6.5
The deployed principal is fully enumerated, with listed rows reconciling to principalOut and $0 residual. Collateral valuation coverage is 85.15% / 85.96%, measured as principal on rows with a finite numeric collateral USD value divided by all enumerated principal / loan-classified principal respectively. Only 23 of 35 records have numeric valuations. A collateral record object alone does not establish valuation or independent custody assurance.
The $153.50M of unpriced principal includes four $25M BTC loans, a $33.5M WBTC loan, $20M of pool-owned USDC positions and a $5 USDtb loan. The three below-par BTC readings are 67.37%, 65.83% and 65.98%; all are flagged uncorroborated. These unresolved readings cover $250M of principal. A separate priced $33.5M BTC loan is at 118.17%, close to par. Uncorroborated readings alone do not prove a loss; the narrower collateral buffer and unresolved evidence limit confidence in backing.
BTC is 80.40%, WBTC 3.52%, XRP 10.16%, ETH 5.34% and HYPE 0.58% of loan-classified principal. USDC has more borrower addresses than its sibling but greater BTC-linked collateral concentration. Borrower spread and correlated collateral measure different risks.
The $83.00M pool-owned liquidity layer is $60M USTB, $20M USDC positions and approximately $3M PYUSD. USTB is 72.29% of the layer. Its GraphQL amount is priced at $1 despite the fund’s accruing NAV, yielding a misleading 8.9% row ratio. The separately reported shared-custody balance is $53.91M against $60M recorded principal; this does not reconcile the position and is not asserted to be an actual $6.09M loss. Custody attribution, NAV and settlement need matching at one block. PYUSD custody matches approximately $3M. An AMM operator’s wallet dust is not the LP-position value.
Loans are delegated underwriting with custodied collateral; OpenTermLoan principal is on-chain, but collateral valuation comes from Maple GraphQL. Margin calls and realization depend on operator action. Notice periods vary by loan: 1–45 days, followed by the recorded 48-hour grace.
Maple’s September 2 mandate expansion includes securities-backed credit, securitization and basis trading, initially staged through syrupUSDT. A collateral token or loan wrapper does not identify strategy: syrupUSDT’s $49.06M USDtb position neither proves nor excludes basis-trade exposure. No strategy allocation is inferred from unknown loan metadata.
Risks and limitations. Collateral is held off-chain under delegate policy. The reported aggregate collateral ratio is 173.65%, but available row valuations and the reported aggregate ($1,203.70M / $1,795.05M) do not reconcile in scope or valuation convention. Neither is an independently verified solvency buffer. The 100% pool accounting-reconciliation ratio checks vault components against totalAssets; it does not verify off-chain collateral. Zero recognized losses does not resolve anomalous collateral readings. Both pools have zero funded delegate cover, so depositors bear losses without a funded delegate first-loss buffer.
3 · Liquidity & Exit — 7.0
Holders can sell through a DEX route or request primary redemption through an operator-processed queue. Secondary exits incur market execution costs; primary settlement depends on available liquidity and queue processing. This axis covers both legs and is constrained by the weaker one.
The latest Ethereum ladder is 2026-10-13T07:31:08Z, selling into USDC. Cost uses (fill_ratio − 1) × 10,000. The rung notional is market-priced, so these figures are all-in against market notional, not NAV. A NAV discount is a separate cost; slippage_bps removes the smallest rung’s spread and must not be substituted for holder cost.
| Notional | Latest all-in bps | History median bps | History IQR bps |
|---|---|---|---|
| $150,000 | -7.77 | -7.28 | 2.83 |
| $250,000 | -9.42 | -9.02 | 2.24 |
| $500,000 | -11.44 | -11.02 | 2.42 |
| $1,000,000 | -14.12 | -13.69 | 2.65 |
Retained history: 95 distinct timestamps per rung, 2026-10-01T13:09:18Z to 2026-10-13T07:31:08Z (11.77 elapsed days), deduplicated on measured_at, not tracker runs. These are successful quotes only: a quote is not a trade, and the missing failure denominator prevents an execution success-rate estimate. Depth-quality/count conditions pass; 14-day duration and measured primary redemption latency do not. No cut threshold is met.
The queue is empty at the financial snapshot. That establishes current queue state, not request-to-fill latency. The withdrawal watch contains an old single watched wallet, not a current latency distribution. Maple’s current disclosure describes FIFO processing, liquidity-dependent delays and no guaranteed maximum period. The historical “under five minutes” claim is not independently verified; the integration guide’s 30-day wording is not treated as an enforceable maximum.
The 721 hourly buckets over September 13–October 13 have median free liquidity 1.48%, with a trailing seven-day median 2.27%. This is an observation over the available window, not a permanent buffer. Accrued interest is included; spendable cash is narrower.
An upgrade to 7.5 requires both legs: at least 30 distinct institutional quotes spanning 14 elapsed days, $250K median better than −10 bps and IQR below 10 bps; plus independently measured primary redemption at size or a latency series supporting the five-minute claim. Count and depth quality pass; duration and primary latency do not. Earliest 14-day clearance is October 15 at 13:09 UTC, conditional on retaining the history. This is not an automatic upgrade date.
Cut review triggers remain $250K median worse than −25 bps, IQR above 50 bps or observed redemption beyond 24 hours. The separate cushion deterioration trigger (persistent monthly median below 0.5%, or an unrecovered ≥5-point jump in deployment) is not established by the available rolling window; next review remains November 1.
4 · Dependencies — 5.5
The pool depends on its underlying stablecoin issuer, Maple’s underwriting and reporting, collateral custodians, supporting-strategy issuers and the venues used to exit. Borrower addresses identify on-chain exposure, without independently identifying firms or proving that firms are unrelated.
| Concentration | All enumerated principal | Loan-classified principal |
|---|---|---|
| Denominator | $1,033.71M | $950.71M |
| Borrower addresses | 17 | 16 |
| Top-1 | 19.35% | 21.04% |
| Top-3 | 46.92% | 51.01% |
| Top-5 | 65.94% | 71.70% |
| HHI | 1132 | 1290 |
Addresses are not independently identified firms; operator/accounting addresses are included where positions use them. Loan-classified top-1/top-3 are 21.04%/51.01%; BTC plus WBTC is 83.92% of that principal. Address diversification leaves correlated collateral, shared custody/governance and a cross-pool XRP borrower. The improvement in borrower shares does not establish independent firms or diversified collateral. Borrower concentration contributes to Dependencies; collateral evidence quality contributes to Backing.
Family concentration is independently recomputed from both complete loan exports: top-1 15.16%, top-3 40.70%, top-5 55.86%, HHI 871 on $1,318.97M all-enumerated principal; 16.99%, 45.61%, 62.61%, HHI 1,044 on $1,176.82M loan-classified principal.
The shared XRP borrower 0x8669f3189ea2318d28c7183a971d65e0c352f1e9 has $151.80M across both pools: 11.51% of all-enumerated family principal / 12.90% of loan-classified family principal. It accounts for the entire XRP bucket, and is the third-largest family borrower. A combined allocation retains this correlated counterparty/collateral exposure and shared governance/custody risk.
5 · Contract & Admin — 4.5
The canonical pools share MapleGlobals, the governor, securityAdmin and the permission Safe. Their Pool Delegate EOAs differ. Holding both pools therefore separates delegate keys but retains common governance and securityAdmin exposure. The snapshot reports both pools active and unpaused, with zero delegate cover and minCoverAmount = 0. Depositors have no funded delegate first-loss buffer.
The September 6 authority walk remains the source for role reach, thresholds and delays: two governor-role EOAs can schedule/execute role changes after three days; securityAdmin has a three-signature undelayed manager-upgrade route, bounded to governor-registered implementations; the delegate’s manager-upgrade path waits seven days, while its withdrawal-manager route can bypass that wait. The October 13 review compares the named governor/securityAdmin/delegate addresses with the current producer snapshot; it does not re-enumerate Safe membership or re-walk bridge authorities. The authority evidence covers canonical Ethereum pools; destination-chain authorities were not re-walked.
Reusable V2 code reviews, withdrawal/timelock reviews and Syrup entry-path reviews have distinct scopes. The October 3 security brief establishes strong source-file matches to the December 2024 review, not a complete audited-build-to-live-bytecode proof. The recorded Maple bounty maximum is $500,000, with privileged-key/centralization exclusions; it is not a dedicated full-pool coverage guarantee. Code assurance does not offset the authority path. syrupUSDT-specific instance coverage remains unestablished.
Documentation and coverage. Maple’s risk disclosures agree that upgrades require authorized actors and approved versions. They do not specify the complete live holder set, thresholds or each bypass delay; those particulars rely on the dated authority walk. An EOA proves the absence of an on-chain quorum, while private key custody arrangements remain unverified. Code assurance does not establish that the live privileged-role topology was audited.
6 · Issuer — 5.5
The named issuer is Maple International Operations SPC, acting for Secured Loan Segregated Portfolio 1; Syrup Ltd operates the interface. The issuer vehicle is a segregated portfolio company. Entity identification and portfolio structure are established in Maple’s issuer disclosure. Lender recourse is limited to the relevant portfolio’s assets. Cross-portfolio ring-fencing does not diversify shared operational exposure.
The entity assessment considers underwriting and custody discretion and Maple’s v1 credit-loss history. The current snapshot establishes no recognized loss now; independent lifetime Syrup loss history is not verified. The 5.5 issuer score is carried from the October 13 research assessment, rather than independently re-derived here.
Risks and limitations. Governing law and the dispute mechanism were not verified in this review. Current accountable principals and entity financial-audit coverage were not independently checked. Naming the issuer does not establish those inputs or guarantee recovery.
Cross-chain exposure
Maple’s September 28 announcement starts a staged CCIP 2.0 rollout on September 29. Token addresses stay fixed while bridge pools change. The article describes native non-Ethereum mint/redeem as future functionality. The receiver integration guide also documents cross-chain messages settled on Ethereum; that is not proof of locally settled redemption on every chain. No score credit is added for an announced future exit route.
Use the current per-asset registry to locate deployments. Its wider network menu is not evidence of material supply on every network, and a family announcement alone does not establish a per-asset deployment. Old pool addresses and authority walks need reconciliation as migration reaches each chain. The measured exit ladder is Ethereum-only: it establishes no executable exit on Monad, Plasma or Solana.
The supply snapshot covers Ethereum, Monad, Solana, Arbitrum and Base; Ink is unavailable and Arc/other newly listed networks are outside that enumeration. The apparent 100% reconciliation is explicitly incomplete. Plasma remains listed pending per-asset deployment reconciliation; it is not a measured USDC supply leg.
Score interpretation and monitoring
The overall score is 6.5. The six displayed axes average 6.25, so overall sits +0.25 above its own axis mean. The source assessment retains its legacy seven-field convention, including Redemption (7.5), whose mean is 6.4286; rounding that mean to the nearest half-point gives the overall score. Redemption is evidence for Liquidity & Exit rather than a seventh displayed axis. The aggregation convention is due for review by November 1 or when an axis changes.
Watch for recognized impairment or default, corroborated collateral shortfalls, unresolved valuation gaps, strategy or authority changes, widening NAV discounts and sustained exit deterioration. Match pool-owned strategy positions to custody balances at one block before treating an unmatched balance as a loss. An empty queue does not establish redemption latency.
Revision history
- 2026-10-13: Refreshed financial snapshots, collateral valuation coverage, allocations, concentration and retained exit history from the October 13 research review. Removed the 100%-priced claim, unsupported universal default lag and stale six-times exit comparison. Updated issuer identity and scoped evidence dates. Overall and all axis scores unchanged; syrupUSDC’s liquidity upgrade remains conditional on duration and measured primary redemption latency.